On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:36:50AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > > GPL with "may be linked to whatever"?
> > It's very close to this. I sat down, analyzed what happened, applied > > the law, and wrote the qualification to the license to describe what > > happened. > > I did *not* create the license; neither I nor anyone else (without > > consent of all developers ever) could possibly do this. > Sure. > But when the License _is_ "may be linked to whatever", and all contributors > contributed under this license as you imply, wouldn't that mean there is > no problem linking it to Qt? Exactly. > > made, but I suspect if we checkout from 2000 we'll find it. (we don't > > actually have a searchable mailing list archive from the late 90's, do > > we?). > None that I am aware of, unfortunately... Well, cvs should save us all :) hawk -- Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \
