On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:37:13PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > But are we sure that everybody really use and like amsmath? > > Surely not. AMS breaks some stuff by redefining environments and > introduces several hundred of new macros that break non-AMS-aware stuff.
Can you please describe for the idiot (me) what commonly deployed classes, available in lyx, use stuff that clashes with AMS ? Anything that requires ERT could easily still use the checkbox thing ... regards, john
