On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:21:14PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > // A 'paste' operation creates a new inset with the correct filepath, > // but then the 'old' inset stored in the 'copy' operation is actually > // added to the buffer.
I don't see how this can happen. We clone the inset used in cut_clone. Can you explain further? regards john
