On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:36:00PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:26:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > "floating text inset"? (simple, but "unusal") > > Floating ?
within the paragraph. Much like InsetOptional. > > Text inset fixed to the first position of par? (not so simple, but more > > similar to current "fisrt word is label" hack) > > A proper layout engine indeed is not simple (at least, not starting from > where we are now). But it's the right way. And I woon't agree with a > usability-harming hack approach instead of that. > > So frankly I think we must live with this horrific label code until such > a time they can be implemented as frames/insets properly. With the 'much like InsetOptional' approach we could have 'labels as insets' in an hour or so. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
