John Levon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 03:05:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > * why "Box::contained" and not "Box::contains" ? Seems odd to use the
> > past tense here ;-)
>
> It's not past tense:
yes it is.
>
> if (box.contained(x, y))
>
> if position x,y is contained in box
>
Then how would say:
if position x,y was contained in box
?
The relevant statements are:
if box contains position x,y
if box contained position x,y
Garst
