Mark van Rossum wrote: > THe attached valid latex file, leads to bad lyx code. > (Only option is to kill lyx)
Nasty. Hundreds of
ERROR (Paragraph::DepthHook): no hook.
Ok there are lots of problems here. First, (fighting back ;-),
underscores are generally regarded as not valid in label entries.
\label{fig_comp}
Running through reLyX and then through lyx2lyx to bump the lyx format
to the current version produces
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{fig
\begin_inset ERT
status Collapsed
\layout Standard
_
\end_inset
comp}
\end_inset
If I edit your original latex file, replacing 'fig_comp' with
'figcomp' and then
$ reLyX -f test.tex; lyx2lyx test.lyx > test_relyx_lyx2lyx.lyx
I get the LyX code:
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{figcomp}
\end_inset
The good news for you is that tex2lyx (André Pönitz's proposed
replacement for reLyX) is able to cope with your 'nasty' label
generating the LyX code:
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{fig_comp}
\end_inset
Moreover, although it generates LyX format 225 (current cvs) the
lyx2lyx in the cvs tree is able to revert to format 221 (that of LyX
1.3.x)
LyX 1.3.x has no problems at all with this file.
This 1.3.x file is superficially a little different to that created by
the route available to you becuase LyX 1.4.x has much better support
for the comment environment. Reverting back to 1.3.x format forces
lyx2lyx to insert ERT.
Note to José: could lyxrevert insert a comment layout instead?
I attach the 'evil' tex->relyx->lyx2lyx file 'test_relyx_lyx2lyx.lyx'
and the 'good' tex->tex2lyx->lyx2lyx(cvs) file
test_tex2lyx_lyx2lyx.lyx
(I commented out \usepackage{namedplus} in test_tex2lyx_lyx2lyx.lyx
because I do not have this package installed.)
Note to André: shouldn't comments in the user preamble should be
preserved? This one was silently swallowed.
Maybe someone else can ascertain where the real bug lies in the relyx
output that leads to the original 'no hook' problem.
--
Angus
test_relyx_lyx2lyx.lyx
Description: application/lyx
test_tex2lyx_lyx2lyx.lyx
Description: application/lyx
