On Monday 17 November 2003 16:56, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Attached. Work in progress, but getting better... more logical now and > more parametrized.
That is true. > If everybody thinks this is going in the right direction, I'll put it > in tomorrow. But I don't know if this is the right direction to follow, or if we should follow an inset based solution. I do not have any problem with the inner tag, I agree with you here. Also this can be extended to latex easily (although not a measure in itself, it shows the usefulness of a feature). My grip is with the LabelTag. Why? In first place I think that should be an inset, it does not make sense to say that we define the term as being the first sequence that was hard-spaces in between. That complicates the code, in lots of places. What I would like to see, the template feature that Jean-Marc discussed some time ago, where everytime that you inset a description layout you would get an empty term inset and you write inside its content without the need to resort to stupid tricks as using hard spaces. Comments? > - Martin You have been doing an exclent work, please continue. :-) -- José Abílio
