Andre Poenitz wrote: > blah blah blah blah blah [I] blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah > blah blah blah BOX blah blah blah blah blah blah > bu bu bub bu bu bu > bu bu bu b ub bub > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah > > is not really satisfactory. But it wasn't different befroe, so I'd just
I stared at the example for some time but couldn't make sense of it ;^) > apply this (possibly with separate xo_ and yo_ variables instead of pos? > I'd do that...) Doing that. >> Solution: we have to distinguish between the two positions, IMO. > > That's the kind of fine-tuning I'd leave for the end. Indeed. Alfredo
