On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:03:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> RFC: Should be begin adding those \param stuff to _all_ functions > >> taking parameters? And use **UNDOC** (or some other marker) when we > >> have no documentation for it? Similar for method description? Would it > >> be helpful, or just wasted effort? > > > | The latter, at least for me. I'd never bother looking up parameters in a > | doxygen if I can access the real file. > > Oh... it is for in-source documentation as well...
In this case I prefer as little line noise as possible. Words like '\param' clearly interfere with reading... But I am not religious about it. As long as I am not required to use it myself, I am fine ;-) Andre'
