On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:54:55PM +0000, Andreas Vox wrote: > José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 08:43:46PM +0200, Chris Karakas wrote: > > > I hope you are not suggesting to change the DocBook SGML Declaration? > > At least because of a small detail like this. > > Well, if Chris wants to, he can of course do it. He just wont be able to produce > LyX documents which produce references which contain the new characters :-P > > And if Chris manages to convince the DocBook stylesheet guys to include his > change to the SGML declaration, I'll be more than happy to provide a patch > which honors this change ;-)
I'm forced to agree with you here. > > As Andreas mentioned it is a question of producing legal code, we use the > > same trick for latex, for identical reasons. > > What, where? There's again some code noone told me about! The road to wisdom has many shortcuts. ;-) > I might have been able to use that! ;-) The problem is that the set of characters that latex doesn't support is not the same as sgml. But it can be used as a model: src/support/lstrings.C (escape) > Ciao > /Andreas -- José Abílio Matos LyX and docbook a perfect match. :-)
