Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Georg Baum wrote: > >> Hacking PATH is not enough, one has to call lyx with --userdir=... >> too (or create a wrapper script). >> Another reason for the version suffix (although not for me at the >> moment) is the File System Hierarchy standard: I can easyly create a >> complying rpm with --version-suffix, but I can't with --prefix. This >> may become important later, e.g. for distributing tex2lyx for 1.3.x >> users. >> >> Anyway, I will not commit the patch but leave it in my private tree. >> I am however curious when the official lyx will be fixed (by >> repairing version-suffix or documenting alternatives or ...) > | Lars may not like the existing solution, but his idea for a | replacement will need to be thought through fully if it is to become | reality. Meanwhile, I think that you should commit your patch as it | improves the current situation.
I'd like to know what relevant the double mention of lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx has on this. and if all other script gets the version suffix, why is ti wrong for lyx2lyx to have ti too? -- Lgb