Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> Hacking PATH is not enough, one has to call lyx with --userdir=...
>> too (or create a wrapper script).
>> Another reason for the version suffix (although not for me at the
>> moment) is the File System Hierarchy standard: I can easyly create a
>> complying rpm with --version-suffix, but I can't with --prefix. This
>> may become important later, e.g. for distributing tex2lyx for 1.3.x
>> users.
>>
>> Anyway, I will not commit the patch but leave it in my private tree.
>> I am however curious when the official lyx will be fixed (by
>> repairing version-suffix or documenting alternatives or ...)
>
| Lars may not like the existing solution, but his idea for a
| replacement will need to be thought through fully if it is to become
| reality. Meanwhile, I think that you should commit your patch as it
| improves the current situation.
I'd like to know what relevant the double mention of lyx2lyx/lyx2lyx
has on this.
and if all other script gets the version suffix, why is ti wrong for
lyx2lyx to have ti too?
--
Lgb
