On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:28:42PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 14:17 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > Martin> So then the original patch should go in, with break added? How
> > Martin> expensive is this with big documents? It scales linearly.
> > 
> > The good thing is that we have really reduce the number of times
> > getFont gets called. Nevertheless, the maybe quadratic in some cases,
> > since getFont is called at least once per paragraph.
> > 
> > The right solution would be to pass a DocIterator or a pit/pos pair to
> > getFont, but this is probably a lot of work.
> > 
> > JMarc
> 
> So... can this go in?

 
+       pit_type pit = pars_.size();
+       for (pit_type it = 0; it < pars_.size(); ++it) {
+               if (&pars_[it] == &par) {
+                       pit = it;
+                       break;
+               }
+       }
        

I just wonder whether

+       pit_type pit = 0;
+       for ( ; pit < pars_.size(); ++pit) 
+               if (&pars_[pit] == &par) 
+                       break;

or even

+       pit_type pit = 0;
+       for ( ; pit < pars_.size() && &pars_[pit] != &par; ++pit) 
+               ;

wouldn't achieve the same.

Andre'

Reply via email to