Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, that's horrid and the one that follows is worse. > What I think you should do is talk to David Kastrup and Jan-Åke Larsson on > the AucTeX mailing list (gmane.emacs.auc-tex) and see why they're messing > up the output that they devised for us.
I tried dvipng 1.7 on linux and its output is exactly equal to what that RE matches. So it is not a problem with dvipng itself but seemingly with the dvipng shipped with MikTeX. -- Enrico
