On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... > | > I will create my own personal tree under branches/ farily soon, I'd > | > rather keep my WIP there than on my own disk. > | > > | > branches/developers/larsbj > | > > | > or something. > | > > | > If you have a better suggestion for the /developers/ name then I'd use > | > that instead. (users, personal etc.) > | > | Why the extra level? If you go this way, /branches/<userid> would be > | fine, I think. > > Perhaps... but I want these branches to be kept out of the way. > And with a separate name to put them under we make it very clear what > these branches are for. > > [...] > > | So that would be my proposal... trunk, after branching off 1.4, in this > | case. Generally, let's create feature branches only according to need. > > Right. We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore? 5928 lasgoutt Jan 09 2003 BRANCH-1_2_X/ 3897 lasgoutt Apr 04 2002 BRANCH_1_1_6/ 10803 lasgoutt Feb 01 17:19 BRANCH_1_3_X/ 4369 levon Jun 12 2002 BRANCH_GUII/ 1760 leeming Mar 14 2001 BRANCH_MVC/ 2284 leeming Jul 19 2001 BRANCH_NATBIB/ 7240 poenitz Jul 04 2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/ 1705 larsbj Mar 07 2001 BRANCH_new_insets/ 9351 baum Dec 06 2004 BooktabBranch/ 9297 abraunst Nov 24 2004 CoordBranch/ 141 ? Sep 27 1999 LyX-Team/ 178 larsbj Oct 07 1999 debugstream/ 807 larsbj Jun 12 2000 dialogbase/ 1337 lasgoutt Jan 15 2001 lyx-1_1_5/ 194 larsbj Oct 13 1999 pathswitch/ 691 rae Apr 26 2000 rae/ 319 larsbj Nov 15 1999 runlatex/ 158 larsbj Oct 01 1999 string-switch/ Based on names, we see a mix of release branches, feature branches and one personal-name branch ;-) - Martin
pgpjNi2FTrLKh.pgp
Description: PGP signature