On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

...
 
> | > I will create my own personal tree under branches/ farily soon, I'd
> | > rather keep my WIP there than on my own disk.
> | > 
> | > branches/developers/larsbj
> | > 
> | > or something.
> | > 
> | > If you have a better suggestion for the /developers/ name then I'd use
> | > that instead. (users, personal etc.)
> | 
> | Why the extra level? If you go this way, /branches/<userid> would be
> | fine, I think.
> 
> Perhaps... but I want these branches to be kept out of the way.
> And with a separate name to put them under we make it very clear what
> these branches are for.
>    
> [...]
> 
> | So that would be my proposal... trunk, after branching off 1.4, in this
> | case. Generally, let's create feature branches only according to need.
> 
> Right.

We have quite a set of branches already... are they all actual anymore?

   5928 lasgoutt            Jan 09  2003 BRANCH-1_2_X/
   3897 lasgoutt            Apr 04  2002 BRANCH_1_1_6/
  10803 lasgoutt            Feb 01 17:19 BRANCH_1_3_X/
   4369 levon               Jun 12  2002 BRANCH_GUII/
   1760 leeming             Mar 14  2001 BRANCH_MVC/
   2284 leeming             Jul 19  2001 BRANCH_NATBIB/
   7240 poenitz             Jul 04  2003 BRANCH_NOUPDATE/
   1705 larsbj              Mar 07  2001 BRANCH_new_insets/
   9351 baum                Dec 06  2004 BooktabBranch/
   9297 abraunst            Nov 24  2004 CoordBranch/
    141  ?                  Sep 27  1999 LyX-Team/
    178 larsbj              Oct 07  1999 debugstream/
    807 larsbj              Jun 12  2000 dialogbase/
   1337 lasgoutt            Jan 15  2001 lyx-1_1_5/
    194 larsbj              Oct 13  1999 pathswitch/
    691 rae                 Apr 26  2000 rae/
    319 larsbj              Nov 15  1999 runlatex/
    158 larsbj              Oct 01  1999 string-switch/

Based on names, we see a mix of release branches, feature branches and
one personal-name branch ;-)

- Martin
 

Attachment: pgpjNi2FTrLKh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to