Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2006 16:01 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | 2251 (well understood and tested) > > But only cosmetic. I do not understand why it cannot wait. Sure it is not so important, but I do not understand why it should wait. What do you expect to happen if we don't put it in 1.4.0? I believe it will then go in 1.4.1 exactly as it is now. > Have anyone done any testing on 2243 at all? I have it in my tree, it works for me, but I have an old dvipng (version 1.5) that works also without the patch. At least this indicates that there are no regressions. > | Given the recent interest in lyx-users we should also think about 2238. > > Have anyone tested this patch? I have, but AFAIK nobody else. Georg
