On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:01:14PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in > | > 1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear. > | > | John targetted some bugs to 1.4.0 recently. Of these, I would like to see > | the following in 1.4.0: > | > | 2251 (well understood and tested) > > But only cosmetic. I do not understand why it cannot wait.
Agreed. ... > If you all are confident in the 2212 fix, it can go in. I am confident, but it's near-useless without also multi-par change tracking (which would make this a useable feature). Cosmetic, as well. So... no, not now. - Martin
pgpkh6njOWsvS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
