Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| > Of course there are many wonderful improvements wrt 1.3 I am not denying
| > that. But if you think that the reason why the qt2 frontend stalled
| > after the polishing is that it is mature as it is then we should not add
| > any new feature to it, should we? just kidding ;-)
|
| Of course we should. However, I do not think that qt2/3 per se is the reason
| (although I agree that the qt2 compatibility is a chock). I think
| establishing the new frontend has undergone several steps:
I think it would be quite ok to drop qt2 support for 1.5, so that we
only have worry about qt3 (and qt4)
--
Lgb
