Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Abdelrazak Younes wrote: | > Of course there are many wonderful improvements wrt 1.3 I am not denying | > that. But if you think that the reason why the qt2 frontend stalled | > after the polishing is that it is mature as it is then we should not add | > any new feature to it, should we? just kidding ;-) | | Of course we should. However, I do not think that qt2/3 per se is the reason | (although I agree that the qt2 compatibility is a chock). I think | establishing the new frontend has undergone several steps:
I think it would be quite ok to drop qt2 support for 1.5, so that we only have worry about qt3 (and qt4) -- Lgb