Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dear Enrico,
I have problems with the -mms-bitfields option passed to gcc for cygwin
and Mingw ports. Is it something related to structure in memory
apparently. Do you know if it is still necessary? I would like to remove
that from cygwin.m4 or create a mingw.m4 but I am not really proficient
in m4.
Abdel,
I always had that option automatically inserted but never cared because
it doesn't seem to hurt. For example, I compile Qt without that option
and LyX with it and never noticed a problem.
I have a problem with the qt4 frontend. The generated executable won't
draw correctly. Something related to badly initialized variable. I have
built the entire tree plus Qt3 without any problems. And I cannot find
any reference as to why this has been introduced.
Next time I will try to get rid of it and tell you. I can't right now,
because building from scratch takes 1.5 hours for me.
OK, if you confirm that you don't have any problem without the option, I
would suggest to just eliminate it in cygwin.m4.
Thanks Enrico,
Abdel.
