On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:33:08PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > I think that it is better to proceed step by step. Is it okay with you > > if I start from scratch and do the minimum necessary to fix real bugs? > > You don't need to start from scratch, since you solved a lot of probelsm > already. I like the step by step approach, and would really appreciate if > you could start with the latex_path fixes and fix the current cygwin_fix > setting. Then you could look at input_path(), and then at the problems > below: > > > Currently these are: > > > > 1) Bug 2344. > > 2) If in a graphics inset an absolute path is inserted by the file dialog, > > it will be exported in the .tex file in posix format, such that miktex > > fails to find the file. This has not been reported by anyone, I > > discovered it browsing the sources. > > If you think that the order should be different: that would also be fine > with me.
Ok, let's take a more pragmatic approach. I am going to post a patch #1 which simply solves the two problems above. I would like them fixed in 1.4.1 such that the binary I'll made available will not be different from that which can be built from the official sources. Notice that I have already incorporated the fix to bug 2344 in 1.4.0, which otherwise would be unusable. Then I am going to separate the checkbox from the cygwin_fix setting. This is going to be patch #2. Then we will see. Is this acceptable for you? -- Enrico
