Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after >> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really >> annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not >> well accepted.
> Bullshit. In my case I don't have the energy nor time to actively backport > this. I used to lurve fights on Fridays. Please be ruder! Angus
