>On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:07:32AM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: > >> I must confess that this patch will break CT in some cases > >Why is there such pushback against making branches for stuff that's >*known* broken?
Because I have a patch at hand that works (at least it should be good enough for the trunk). Unfortunately, the diff file comprises 1900 lines of code. Rather than committing all at once, I was asked to submit small chunks such that people have the chance to review it. I don't see the necessity to create branch because that neither help the reviewers nor me. If you help me to review the changes (or just say OK), we might have a stable trunk by the end of the week. Michael
