On Monday 08 May 2006 18:43, Bo Peng wrote: > That is quicker than ./configure but I agree that it is a concern. waf > claims that it can do better here (by cache previous thinking > process.)
I have seen you refer waf several times. Will those changes be merged in upstream scons? I read a blog from Aaron Seigo recently where we complained that kde had to basically fork scons and upstream never took their complains into account as opposed to cmake, and that was a definitive reason for their choice. Just curious, -- José Abílio
