On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:24:42PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Bo Peng a écrit : > >Dear list, > > > >*Please* just put cold comparison data in this thread. No discussion > >and debates. (Open another thread if needed). > > > >On my dual processor Xeon 2.8G Linux workstation, I get > > > >scons --config=force -j3 frontend=qt4 qt_dir=/path/to/qt4 => 6:37s > >autogen.sh; ./configure....; make -j3 > > => 10:32s > > > >I expect larger difference under windows, but we need to wait for the > >numbers there. > > Windows/mingw/qt4 > > scons frontend=qt4 qt_dir=d:/program/Qt/4.1 > extra_inc_path=d:/mingw/include extra_lib_path=d:/mingw/lib > > clean compile lyx+tex2lyx = 45 minutes > > null compile = 4 minutes > Loading qt4 tool... 45 seconds > scons: Building targets ... 3 minutes > > Windows/cygwin/mingw/qt4 > autogen.sh 2 minutes > configure 6 minutes > > I don't have the time to do a full autotools recompile now but IIRC it > was around 1h30. A null compile is quicker though, we need to tweak that > Bo because waiting 4 minutes for nothing is not acceptable. What's this > "Loading qt4 tool" doing? Is it possible to just skip the first config > phase?
And you compiled using -O2 with scons, too, right? Otherwise this is an unfair comparison. I have numbers close to yours on cygwin, but I cannot convince scons to compile using -O2. -- Enrico
