On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Here numbers from Windows/Linux, > scrolling the Guide, in sec:
The userguide does not evidence the problem on Windows. When using a big file with *lots* of displayed equations and images, LyX on Windows with native qt3 is about 3 times slower than LyX on linux, and more than 6 times slower with qt4 (wrt linux-qt3). > Qt4.1.3, release, > Linux no anti-al.: 19 > Linux with anti-al.: 25 > Windows 2k : 30 > > LyX 1.3.6, Qt 3.3.4 > Linux no anti-al.: 6-7 > Linux with anti-al.: 6-7 > > > Is 1.5 so slow only because of Qt > or are there also changes of LyX > responsible for? LyX is also responsible for that. -- Enrico
