Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Peter Kümmel wrote: <censored because there was a smiley>
I didn't know the 'no-smiley day', but it looks interesting, and I think I like it. > We should keep one (qt4 of course) <no-smiley day> Yes, I would drop all other front ends from trunk immediately. </no-smiley day> >> 2 operating systems, > > 3. You forgot MacOSX! > >> Qt bugs, > > Not much we can do about that. > here a reply from Trolltech. As I feared they wrote: Hey Peter, On Saturday, 17. Jun 2006 11:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Short description: > X11 support of maximized/normaized QWidget > > What I did: > It's not too hard to remember the size ond position of a QWidget before > maximizing. > So why do you not bring on par with Windows the maximize/normalize X11 code? This is the responsibility of the system window manager. If this functionality was drawn into Qt it would restrict the freedom with which differing windowing/layout approaches are applied. This would be easy to implement, but it is the core functionality extended by a window manager, and should remain distinct from the construction of the window's contents. Thanks for the suggestion. Kind regards, >> review process... > > It will be smoother once you get used to the coding style and get more > trust from the "historic" developers (including you Georg). > <no-smiley day> Often it sounds like this: "Be a slave or leave." </no-smiley day> >> >> And Abdel don't feel guilty, I don't stop contribution, but >> in future I will think twice before starting anything. > > Pfiou... I'm relieved! > > Abdel. > >
