Georg Baum wrote: > Peter Kümmel wrote: > >> Yes, a simplest and good solution, 0 would never be a saved size of a >> window. Peter > > And even if it would it should be ignored. I guess that there is a sensible > minimum size in qt itself?
Yes, I also think so. And the variables are initialized in lyx_main with unsigned int width = 690; unsigned int height = 510; so absolutely nothing worse could happen. I've checked it in. Peter
