Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Abdelrazak> I know it's a bit late to voice my opinion but I think it
| Abdelrazak> should have been:
|
| Off-topic questions:
|
| Abdelrazak> typedef std::basic_string<unsigned short> ucs2_string;
|
| why do we use unsigned short instead of boost::uint16_t here. I know
| they are the same, but wouldn't it be clearer?
Perhaps.
(but of course we don't have a basic_string<unsigned short> anyway...)
| Why don't we have ucs4_t and ucs2_t types?
Because we don't have the semantics right.
We only have codepoints and have no clue what to do with them.
--
Lgb
