>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> If you give a nice name to ascii_guill I'd think that the code Lars> could be even clearer than it is now. Lars> I am not sure that you can have you cake and eat it at all Lars> times... unicode is more cumbersome to work with. But operator== wold be perfect for me. Lars> ostringstream will be a challenge... (or perhaps not... we might Lars> be able to create a odocstringstream kindo thing easily.) And this would maybe give us what we miss from a string (easy concatenation, seemless use of C strings when it makes sense). JMarc
