On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
> 1.1.6 as well. I'd better do it fast for fix3 I guess. So I can commit
> the change to head for it to get in 116 right ? I'll commit if so
I've been doing something silly here. I have two doc directories, one
which is lyxdoc, and one which is the 1.1.6 branch of lyxdoc. I usually
edit lyxdoc, then copy the entire file to the 1.1.6 branch, then commit
them both. (I'm not very good with CVS). This way, both versions get
updated, and since they haven't diverged yet, everything should be okay.
JMarc has decreed that the 1.1.6fix3 docs will come from the 1.1.6 branch,
which is why I have been doing the double updates. When fix3 comes out
(presumably shortly after Lars gets back), we will declare the 1.1.6
branch dead and move on.
> > provide any way to easily see the changes (anyone want to code a diff mode
> > into LyX :-) Perhaps we should do something "silly" like put all edits in
> > blue or underlined or something until the change is mutually agreed on or
> > some such. Any recommendations for dealing with this?
> it is ironic the lyxdoc team have requested this feature along with
> many others :)
Just shows that we are dumb users, too :-)
> I think the thing is to support changelog latex package (does this support
> changebars ?) then we can support collaborative stuff much better. I used to
> use a unix package (I forget the name -- inter<something>) which supported
> this pretty well
I wasn't aware of this package. I'll have to check it out. (Not that it
will help directly here, but it is still interesting.)
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
