On Friday 22 March 2002 16:16, Ronald Florence wrote: > Robin Turner writes: > > Some spam is so funny [...] > > A certain amount of spam may be inevitable on the mailing list, but I > suspect I'm not alone in hoping that subscribers won't aggravate the > annoyance with commentary on the spam.
Or commentary on commentaries? We could get into a Von Neumann infinite regress here ;-) I had assumed a certain amount of light-hearted commentary on _whatever_ was acceptable on the list. I admit I should have marked it OT (as I have done with this one) though why someone who doesn't wish to read commentary on spam should bother opening a post marked Re: <name of spam> is beyond me. Robin
