On 4/22/07 4:01 PM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 22 apr 2007, at 23.31, Bob Lounsbury wrote: > >> On 4/22/07 3:07 PM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 22 apr 2007, at 22.35, Bob Lounsbury wrote: >>>> On 4/22/07 1:58 AM, "Anders Ekberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I recompiled both Qt4.3.0snapshot and Qt4.2.3 and the only >>>>>> difference was >>>>>> rather than using sudo make install¹ I just entered make >>>>>> install¹. Now I >>>>>> have LyX1.5.0beta2 compiled under Qt4.2.3, but I got the same >>>>>> error >>>>>> message >>>>>> when trying Qt4.3.0snapshot qt 4 library not found¹. A bug report >>>>>> would be >>>>>> great, I really want to see if Qt4.3 is faster. Thanks for the >>>>>> info. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bob >>>>> >>>>> I guess the problem is that we need to figure out whether it is >>>>> a QT >>>>> or an LyX-issue... >>>>> It is interesting that your compilation works? Do you have more >>>>> info >>>>> on your configuration? My fails on 10.4.9 (G4). with gcc 4.0.1, >>>>> automake 1.10 and gettext 0.14.5. >>>>> But I will try again to make sure I didn't do something stupid. >>>>> >>>>> /Anders >>>> >>>> I'm using 10.4.9 (G3) with gcc 4.0.1, automake 1.9.6, and gettext >>>> 0.14.5. I >>>> really don't know if it's an LyX or Qt issue. The only thing I >>>> noticed was >>>> that my qt4.3.0 directory is missing a mkspecs folder that is in >>>> qt4.2.3 >>>> even though they were compiled with the same ./configure command. I >>>> guess >>>> I'll send a configure log to the development list. >>>> >>>> Bob >>> >>> Do that. The problem is also reported in the tread: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg113399.html >>> >>> It seems our configurations are similar apart from the automake >>> version. Still I get an error with: >>> /usr/bin/ld: can't locate file for: -lQtAssistantClient >>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >>> make[2]: *** [../../bin/qtdemo.app/Contents/MacOS/qtdemo] Error 1 >>> make[1]: *** [sub-qtdemo-make_default] Error 2 >>> make: *** [sub-demos-make_default-ordered] Error 2 >>> >>> The only explanation I can think of is if you compiled QT with the - >>> nomake demos. That should probably avoid this error (I will try it >>> now), but of course that doesn't solve the basic problem of compiling >>> LyX... >>> >>> /Anders >> >> I also got this error if I include the '-nomake examples' command. >> However, >> if I remember correctly it went away when I didn't use this. I also >> assumed >> this wouldn't affect LyX compilation. >> >> Bob > > Thanks for the details Bob. And I can confirm that the compilation > worked with -nomake demos. > I have filed a bug report to Trolltech regarding the failed compilation. > So it seems that one is under control. Now it's just the LyX- > configuration left... > > /Anders So, yesterday I booted into Ubuntu (I have a dual-boot) because I wanted to update LyX there also. There was a distribution upgrade so I upgraded then compiled 1.5.0svn/beta2 (not sure which it is if downloaded from svn). By default it used Qt4.2.3 and now I have the LyX "slowness" under Linux. This leads me to believe that the issues are directly due to Qt4.2.3. I'm thinking of compiling an earlier version of Qt to see if the slowness goes away since we can't get LyX to compile with Qt4.3. Bob
