Joost Verburg schrieb:

What is the reason for this complaint?

That this prevents computers from beeing able to go to sleep mode and save battery energy. Weh discussed this some time ago and you said that this is not the case. I can't test this and don't have a strong opinion.

If you know of a better solution to get the same result, let me know and I will 
change it.

This is more simple as it is only executed when the file is changed:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_5_X/development/Win32/packaging/AltInstaller/specials/PDFViewWin/PDFViewWin.dpr

Anyway I think PDF viewing that works on Vista is more important than a complaint of a user that's probably just about programming style.

Of course. I simply didn't have the time to work on that.

So you would prefer the launcher to be called LyXLauncher.exe instead of lyx.exe?

Yes. There were questions on the users-list about this naming.

I used the latter because it's the most obvious name for the executable that starts the application in a normal way. Why did you develop a different application if renaming would also be sufficient?

The reason was again Windows Vista. The user who contacted me, had the problem that your launcher couldn't be executed when Vista is run in certain security modes.
Some users even praised my launcher:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg57245.html

The source code can be found here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_5_X/development/Win32/packaging/AltInstaller/specials/Launcher/lyxLauncher.dpr

I don't have strong opinions about filenames and things like that, so I would suggest to just ask the devel list for opinions and to use the same tools for all installers.

As long as I have been using LyX, lyx.exe was the main executable and I 
wondered why you changed this.

regards Uwe

Reply via email to