>rgheck wrote: >>> >> I'll have a look at this under one of my Fedora 10 machines. >> >As I said in the bug report, I was unable to reproduce this problem >under F10, even fully updated. And that was using the test file attached >to the report, trying to follow the instructions given. It's possible >that the problem was caused by some kind of corruption of a key file and >was fixed by the re-install, not because anything got downgraded but >simply because the corrupt file got fixed. > >rh
This is absolutely possible (provided it wasn't a file of lyx itself, since I reinstalled it plenty of times). All I can say is that no other program seemed to have problems. In a couple of weeks (when having a working lyx has become less of a priority) I'll upgrade again and we'll see. Michael
