Scott, thank you for the tip, I think I'll be using lyx2.0 from now on. Unfortunately, the problem persists in both versions (2.0.6 and 2.1.0).
-- wbr, Dmitry On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 19:43 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > I don't know if it will fix this problem, but you might want to see if > it's solved in LyX 2.0.6. Since you're on Ubuntu, it's very easy to > use the newest stable version of LyX without having to give up your > current version. They can be both installed with no risk. To do this, > see the instructions here: > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnUbuntu#toc3 > > Scott > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Dmitry Zotikov <x...@ungrund.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've been using LyX on Ubuntu 11.xx for quite a while (I believe that > > was version 2.0.2 or 2.0.3) and used to have fonts rendered like this: > > http://s22.postimg.org/ql77qjb0x/Screenshot_Ly_X_doc_Intro_lyx_read_only.png > > > > Recently I've migrated to Ubuntu 13.04 which has LyX version 2.0.3, but > > apparently uses a different version of QT. Fonts are rendered > > differently as well: > > http://s10.postimg.org/t47iudqzd/Screenshot_from_2013_08_03_18_20_38.png > > > > Is it possible to make the fonts rendered as they were before? > > > > AFAIU, the difference is that in the first case it was RGB antialiasing, > > while in the second it's "grayscale". I thought that might have been a > > QT's problem, but in other QT apps the fonts are perfectly fine (and in > > the LyX's windows other than the main editing area). > > > > -- > > wbr, Dmitry > >
