On Saturday 22 March 2014 06:10:35 Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Wolfgang Engelmann writes: > > Here are the two archives. AA-PBR contains the spbasic.bst, after > > having archived the AA-PBR.lyx file, AA-SP.tar.gz does not, after > > having archived the AA-SP.lyx file. > > > > I have tried to adjust the document- and tool settings in both lyx > > files. > > The different behavior is triggered by the "Add bibliography to TOC" > checkbox (it is checked in AA-SP.lyx but not in AA-PBR.lyx). > > > exporting both files to .tex gives these differences: > You should rather look at the differences in the .lyx files. > This is the relevant hunk: > > diff -u AA-PBR.lyx AA-SP.lyx > [...] > @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@ > \begin_inset CommandInset bibtex > LatexCommand bibtex > bibfiles "A-Test" > -options "spbasic" > +options "bibtotoc,spbasic" > > As you can see, checking "Add bibliography to TOC" changes the > options field. However, lyxpak.py is not expecting more than one > bst file and thus does not try to split the options field at commas. > It simply checks whether the file "bibtotoc,spbasic.bst" exists. > As that file does not exist, it is not added to the archive. > > The fix is trivial and simply consists in replicating what is > already done for bib files (which are expected to be a comma > separated list). > > Please, file a bug about this issue.
Thanks, Enrico for pointing to the culprit. When I changed Add bibliography to TOC to NOT, the archive still did not export the .bst file. I had to export the lyx file using another name. Now it works. Where and how do I file a bug? Wolfgang
