> On May 31, 2016, at 08:21, Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think 168 was pretty good. use 236 and let me know how it goes. > 236 had was meant to manage Quad, but it has a couple of challenges > there. without Quad it may be fine.
I'll stay on 236 for the time being, then. I'm not using my M100 heavily, so I may not notice any bugs anyway. One thing I'm confused about is how I can load a RAM image without saving the current RAM contents to the image that REX thinks I'm currently using. For example, if the machine hangs and I need to do a cold boot to recover, then I really don't want the current RAM contents written back to whatever image is flagged as the current one. -- Mark J. Blair, NF6X <n...@nf6x.net> http://www.nf6x.net/
