When I was developing mComm I had a TERM mode. It would not work in TERM if I 
turned off rts cts. Should not be that way but I had issues with it until I 
turned flow control on.
Kurt
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
> can you explain that a bit more? Are you saying that T200 requires hardware 
> flow control signalling to be valid at the connector?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 5:15 PM Kurt McCullum <ku...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> __
>> Yes the 200 requires rts cts even when not set in TERM. This has bit me many 
>> times.
>> Kurt
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, at 2:11 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
>>> that's news. not sure I believe that. 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 5:10 PM Russell Davis <rkda...@burninghorse.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Just got told on twitter i have to mod the wifi32 for use with the T200. 
>>>> The m100/102 doesn't require rts/cts to be enabled on the modem but the 
>>>> t200 does.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -Russell
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/4/2019 4:12 PM, Russell Davis wrote:
>>>> > Going slowly potty. I have a WiFI32 which is a wifi "modem" (esp8266 
>>>> > and some serial glue) and it works perfectly on the M102 with or 
>>>> > without flow control set in stat (58N1D and 58N1E) but I can't get it 
>>>> > to work to work on the T200. set STAT to 58N1ENN, 58N1DNN, 58N1DNI,... 
>>>> > and in TERM if I type a character it freezes hard. only thing that 
>>>> > works is to power cycle. if i'm in bank 2 it seems to return to the 
>>>> > telcom program and next character appears but typing another character 
>>>> > freezes the T200 again. I suspect it's something to do with flow 
>>>> > control but completely flummuxed.
>>>> >
>>>> > Are there major differences between the M100/102's rs232 and the 
>>>> > T200's? or could the REX that is in the T200 be causing problems? I 
>>>> > can't see how it could be but i'm grasping at any straws that could be 
>>>> > around.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > bst rgrds
>>>> >
>>>> > Russell
>>>> >
>>>> >

Reply via email to