Thanks when I get some time I will check these suggestions. Is the bootloader code part of the Microchip USB routines?
On Saturday, July 18, 2020, B4 Me100 <b4me...@hotmail.com> wrote: > One thing I forgot… If you are using the free/unlicensed version then > there is no optimization. It could be the VT100 app was compiled with a > licensed version of the compiler with some level of optimization. > > From: M100 <m100-boun...@lists.bitchin100.com> on behalf of Ken Pettit < > petti...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: <m...@bitchin100.com> > Date: Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 2:22 PM > To: <m100@lists.bitchin100.com> > Subject: Re: [M100] PIC32MX (off topic but related!) > > Hey Steve, > > Configuration bits? Are you setting those correctly to ensure the proper > clock mode is selected, etc? > > Ken > > On 7/18/20 2:02 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > Well ok thanks guys. > In a nutshell, ( long winded explanation of problem to follow)... > > The Geoff VT100 page has both Geoffs source project files as well a binary > file that can be programmed. > > The binary contains the application plus bootloader > > When I try to build the project myself (unchanged) I get a different > binary that does not seem to include the bootloader. In any case I > cannot see a way to produce the same binary as what he provides. I cant > relplicate his build. > > As well, I cant see anything that seems to relate to the bootloader > functionality in the actual code. > > Very confusing. > > In any case, the code that MPLAB X produces can be programmed but it does > not work. Meaning if I erase the part completely and then attempt to > program my application, the device does not start after the application is > loaded. > > However I know my binary works because if I program it OVER TOP of an MCU > that has the original binary in it, I can thusly install my application and > see it run. > > So it really seems like I can produce working application code .. but the > bootloader portion cant be generated from scratch. I must be already in > there by separate means for my application to work. > > > So I am a bit stuck. The only way I can produce MVT100 processors is to > first program with the original code and then overlay my code. > > Strange. > > Any thoughts? I really am a newbie on these things. > > Thabks Steve > >> <Snip> >> >> >
