I would have :)

But running it on CloudT was WAY more convenient.  And very cool!

Jerry

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022, 10:21 PM Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Convenience; how many people would have dug out a special cable (if they
> had one) and speakers to listen to Ken's Xmas card...
>
> m
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 8:21 PM Gregory McGill <arcadeshop...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I realize that, but since it sounds like a very small potato.... why not
>> hook up speakers to the cass out like my model 3/4 does
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:04 PM Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we're trying to use the internal beeper like the PC, PET etc. do
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 6:23 PM Gregory McGill <arcadeshop...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why don't you play it out the cassette port like the other trash80s do?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022, 7:57 PM Ken Pettit <petti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/29/22 6:46 PM, MikeS wrote:
>>>>> > There's quite a bit of 1-bit music out there for the PC, PET and
>>>>> other systems that only had a speaker, some of it remarkably good; should
>>>>> be possible to use similar techniques and even the same sound files on the
>>>>> M100.
>>>>>
>>>>> I actually tried playing a 1-bit audio file (that I recorded) last
>>>>> night
>>>>> on the M100 using a small ML routine I wrote.  I could tell it was a
>>>>> person talking, but couldn't make out any of the words.  I think the
>>>>> piezoelectric device the M100 uses as a "speaker" just doesn't cut
>>>>> it.
>>>>> At least I believe that is the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken
>>>>>
>>>>> > Re MIDI: there was a project years ago to use an M100 as a MIDI
>>>>> sequencer; IIRC the baud rate was 'close enough'. I cobbled together an
>>>>> interface for a proof-of-concept and it seemed to work OK; never went
>>>>> beyond that though ;-(
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I was kinda wondering / thinking 1.7% error might be close
>>>>> enough,
>>>>> but not having any MIDI devices, I have no way to test it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ken
>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to