So why not add word EXPERIMENTAL to all builds in maho's repository except to DEVELOPMENT/ALPHA ones (a special build or builds after 2.4 with all included new features) and RELEASE (>= 3.0; well; this is more useful for the builds leading to 3.0, like 3.0RC1 or 3.0m1; after 3.0 the RELEASE naming should be dropped)?
Lp, m. On Feb 20, 2008 8:03 AM, André Schnabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > Pavel Janík schrieb: > > > >> Oh no - German team doas not feel that Aqua is ready for relese. > >> There is more than one member in the team ;) > > > > that is interesting to know ;-) Both things. > > > > In the Czech Mac team (also more than one member ;-), we already > > agreed on that Mac-Aqua is more usable than Mac-X11 about a half a > > year ago and we also decided that we won't even build X11 at all > > because of this. We build X11 just as a platform-reference and do not > > upload it etc. Only in case of problems in aqua... > > Just the weekend before this suggestinon I got a "presentation" of the > Aqua-version. File-Open Dialogs that show nothing when launched a second > time, Calc showing the tabs vor Tables in a very ugly way. > > But I get the feeling, the communication with the mac porting team it is > a real mess. Actually Aqua native is supposed one of the key features > for OOo 3.0 - so how can it be ready now? If the Mac team thinksit is > ready to release - fine. But I'd expect that this would be announced. > I cannot see Aqua naitve version as ready for release at the > Proting-Project pages and also not at the mac porting pages. > > So: what is the status of the Aqua native version? > > > André > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
