The rumour only mentioned the PowerBook.  The claim is they aren't going
to be able to push the G5 much faster and that's why the PowerBook
upgrades will stop.  

The iBooks don't run the very fastest processors yet so presumably they
could be upgraded a while longer, until they're running the same CPU as
the current PowerBook generation. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:owner-macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu] On Behalf Of Marta
Edie
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 3:58 PM
To: macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: MacGroup: The last PowerPC PowerBooks?

Does that go for the iBook, too?
Marta
On Aug 12, 2005, at 15:49, Jerry Freeman wrote:

> who knows what lurks in the tattered crevices of steve jobs mind :) a 
> lot of people will choose to wait it out unless they have a legitimate

> need for a powerbook now, or for some reason can't stand the notion of

> an intel box...jf
>
> On Aug 12, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Rex Baldazo wrote:
>
>> Rumour of course, but the scuttlebutt is that we may have only one 
>> more upgrade to the PowerPC-based PowerBooks and then that's it, 
>> nothing until the Intel-based PowerBooks:
>
>> I thought Apple wasn't planning on an Intel-based laptop until 2007, 
>> which would mean over a year without any new PowerBook models.  That 
>> can't be right, I hope.
>>
>> --- Rex.
>
> ============================================================
> ubiquitous \yoo-BIK-wih-tuhs\, adjective:
> Existing or being everywhere, or in all places, at the same time.
>
>



| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will be August 25.

| The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>



| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be August 25. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>

Reply via email to