Standard 32-bit armhf image. Built 4.19.y-rt kernel7l image and installed.
Joe On Sunday, October 27, 2019 at 11:02:35 AM UTC-7, Michael Brown wrote: > > Are you running a 32-bit(armhf) or 64-bit(arm64) build ? > > Michael > > On Sunday, 27 October 2019 00:35:15 UTC+2, Joseph wrote: >> >> First issue: Tried installing the MK package on RPi4 but get dependency >> error as follows >> >> pi@rpi4-2gb:~ $ sudo apt-get install machinekit-rt-preempt >> Reading package lists... Done >> Building dependency tree >> Reading state information... Done >> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have >> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable >> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created >> or been moved out of Incoming. >> The following information may help to resolve the situation: >> >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >> machinekit-rt-preempt : Depends: machinekit (= >> 0.1.1570528621.git9239acb-1~buster) but it is not going to be installed >> Depends: yapps2-runtime but it is not installable >> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. >> >> >> >> Second issue: building MK on RPi4 native and get link error >> /usr/bin/ld: objects/hal/utils/halcmd_commands.o: undefined reference to >> symbol '__atomic_load_8@@LIBATOMIC_1.0' >> /usr/bin/ld: //usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libatomic.so.1: error adding >> symbols: DSO missing from command line >> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >> make: *** [hal/utils/Submakefile:32: ../bin/halcmd] Error 1 >> make: Leaving directory '/home/pi/machinekit/src' >> >> The library is present and running strings on it shows the symbol is >> available >> >> pi@rpi4-2gb:/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf $ ls -l libatom* >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Apr 15 2019 libatomic.so.1 -> >> libatomic.so.1.2.0 >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30104 Apr 15 2019 libatomic.so.1.2.0 >> pi@rpi4-2gb:/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf $ strings libatomic.so.1.2.0 >> fU.+ >> fU2+ >> __gmon_start__ >> _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable >> _ITM_registerTMCloneTable >> __cxa_finalize >> __atomic_load_8 >> memcpy >> __atomic_load_1 >> __atomic_load_2 >> __atomic_load_4 >> __atomic_load >> ... >> >> Has anyone successfully built MK for the RPi4? If so would you share >> your method? >> >> Thank you, Joe >> >> -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/419c8ce5-74f3-474e-b60a-d3630b3b975a%40googlegroups.com.
