On Monday, June 11, 2001, at 02:24 PM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > Ho-hum. On closer inspection the dynaloader error messages look much > like > there's a big confusion going on: both the symbols of the newly built > (mini)perl *AND* the operating system's already installed shared > Perl library are visible. This definitely smells like a dangerous > recipe, we are mixing symbols from a 5.7.1+ executable and 5.6.0 > library together. Now, why is the /System shared lib being pulled in? I know all over the Configure I saw /System fly by for the defaults, but I doubt that would have bearing on this. Am I correct? Larry
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Larry Shatzer
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Andy Dougherty
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Larry Shatzer
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Edward Moy
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Larry Shatzer
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Ken Williams
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Larry Shatzer
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Andy Dougherty
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Ken Williams
- Re: perl@10517 (Fail) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Ken Williams
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Ken Williams
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Fwd: perl@10517 (Fail) Nicholas Clark