On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:29, Yves de Champlain wrote:
- more obscure names should either have a good description or a clearer name like with_* / without_* / enable_* / disable_* to at least give a clue if we are triggering a dependency or an inner mechanism. A good example : disable_utf8mac, disable_extra_encodings, enable_cp932fix (libiconv).
This was suggested once, and implemented in a few ports, but I still don't see the advantage over the "normal" MacPorts variant naming, which would be, respectively, +utf8mac, +no_extra_encodings, and +cp932fix.
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
