Le 07-06-21 à 16:51, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:29, Yves de Champlain wrote:
- more obscure names should either have a good description or a
clearer name like with_* / without_* / enable_* / disable_* to at
least give a clue if we are triggering a dependency or an inner
mechanism. A good example : disable_utf8mac,
disable_extra_encodings, enable_cp932fix (libiconv).
This was suggested once, and implemented in a few ports, but I
still don't see the advantage over the "normal" MacPorts variant
naming, which would be, respectively, +utf8mac,
+no_extra_encodings, and +cp932fix.
Well, if we could have a "normality" definition written in the new
committers docs, that would just be many times better than having the
most advantageous naming scheme anyway.
yves
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
