Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> Given all the other unfinished or unstarted work in MacPorts which
> needs to happen just to get the collection halfway reliable, it seems
> to me that arguing over the safety of a commonly used checksum is
> little more than a distraction and represents time that could be
> devoted to more important pursuits, like cleaning up the variant code,
> or getting a distributed unit testing setup going, or ...

I guess now with all the whitespace converted and the extra modelines
added and all the patchfiles renamed, we need some new distraction...

Or we could paint it mauve ?
--anders

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

Reply via email to