On 17 mai 08, at 07:32, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On May 14, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > >> Alakazam wrote: >>> Would it be possible to have an octave PortGroup ? That would make >>> it easier to maintain several octave-forge modules in separate >>> portfiles, I think. >> >> Yes, in theory. But until we resolve #14553 [1], port groups can >> only be shipped with new releases (and releases seem to be rare at >> the moment). >> >> Rainer >> >> [1] http://trac.macports.org/ticket/14553 > > There will have to be a new release of MacPorts base soon enough. A > *lot* has been done since 1.6.0 and jmpp has already talked on the > list about a 1.6.1 release. So if you want a new portgroup, get it > written and committed now so it can be a part of 1.6.1.
If we agree that that is the correct solution for octave-forge, I can look into this in the next couple of days. -- Alakazam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
