On Jun 6, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to simply make the creation and homing of a testing framework a bigger priority? I've said it many times, but I'll say it again: If someone can handle the creation part, I'm fairly confident that the "homing" situation can be worked out.
There have been a few attempts at this in the past - what was wrong with them again? (I can remember at least three - your chroot build scripts, wbb4's builds that auto generated a website that listed failures and successes, and blb's mpab http://trac.macports.org/wiki/MPAB)
Perhaps there's just a little more work that needs to happen to get things into a state where we can work out the 'homing' situation?
I actually had a hacked up version of your scripts running with disk images (with the ports getting installed onto shadow files - I was thinking it might be possible to build packages from that output too ...) but got distracted by something shiny ;-)
... but packaging will all be fixed once we get apkg, right? ;-) -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- dl...@geeklair.net ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
