On Sep 2, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Sep 2, 2009, at 12:14 PM, William Davis wrote:
While some (xulrunner, firefox) just need new inline-asm to be
written for 64bit support, others (wine) may *NEVER* actually work
in 64bit. It may be the case that users need a 32bit wine for
win32 and a 64bit wine for win64. ... so it's not really
trivially fixable when it is by design.
Jeremy, I'm sorry to be that unclear: what I meant was "modify the
port file to build universal" for each port that needed that. In
other words fix the individual port files as needed instead of
building all ports universal..
William,
You seem to be missing the idea that the 64bit version of a port
needs 64bit versions of all its dependencies (and a 32bit version
likewise needs a 32bit version of all of its dependencies).
--
Daniel J. Luke
No, I'm not but see my last answer to Ryan.
William Davis
frstanATbellsouthDOTnet
Mac OS X ver 10.6 Darwin 10.6
XQuartz 2.3.4 (xorg-server 1.4.2-apple45)
Mac Mini Intel Duo @ 1.86 GHz
Mundus vult decepi, ego non
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
