On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:00:31PM -0700, Toby Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:53, Jack Howarth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 05:44:59PM -0500, Brian Barnes wrote:
> >>
> >> Or, perhaps let's hope that people exist with motive, means and
> >> opportunity to contribute to gcc and keep it working on OS X, and are
> >> able to do so. I would rather not lose future updates to the only fast,
> >> free Fortran compiler on OS X. I cannot comprehend why you wish for some
> >> of us to lose our tools with no fast, free replacement even vaguely in
> >> sight.
> >>
> >> Brian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> macports-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
> >
> > That answer is easy. Toby doesn't need them.
>
> While that is true, the main thing is that this discussion belongs elsewhere.
>
> This is macports-dev
>
> - Toby
Toby,
Well it directly impacts one of your ports (regardless of how much you
detest that particular package) and all other ports like octave that depend
on it.
Jack
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
